Other Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,596
v. DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION
as 5:2024cv00017
Defendant: DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
v. OLIVER
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff: ANTHONY J OLIVER
Defendant: COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LOVAS v. HANCOCK
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff: PAMELA LOVAS
Defendant: SHERIFF BILLY HANCOCK
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
LACLAIR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff: DEREK LACLAIR
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BRIDGES v. EARLY COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 1:2023cv00198
Plaintiff: ANTHONY BRIDGES
Defendant: EARLY COUNTY GEORGIA, JAMES KIMBLE, WILLIAM C PRICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FROST v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2023cv00142
Plaintiff: GREGORY LERON FROST
Defendant: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, JUDGE RICHARD M COWART and JULIA BAUN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS et al v. BLECKLEY COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2023cv00464
Plaintiff: PAUL WILLIAMS, HEATHER WILLIAMS and HIDDEN CREEK FARMS & TRANSPORT LLC
Defendant: BLECKLEY COUNTY GEORGIA, MIKE DAVIS and JAYME KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEWART v. SAMPSON
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER BRYAN STEWART
Defendant: WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DICKERSON v. BURDEN et al
as 4:2023cv00185
Plaintiff: THOMAS RAY DICKERSON
Defendant: ANTAEVYON BURDEN and LAMAR COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAY v. SASNETT et al
as 7:2023cv00120
Plaintiff: JEFFREY GRAY
Defendant: CATHY SASNETT, SGT. KYLE WHITE and MIKE WELCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?