Cases 41 - 50 of 1,151
Fuentes v. Salisbury
as 1:2023cv00228
Petitioner:
Jesus D Fuentes
Respondent:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boudreau v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2023cv00259
Petitioner:
Jason Boudreau
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tassone v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Gary Tassone
Defendant:
Wayne Salisbury, Nancy Routolo Hull, Dorathy Kruck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sennon v. Houston House
as 1:2023cv00231
Petitioner:
Joel P. Sennon
Respondent:
Houston House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lastarza v. Neronha et al
as 1:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Lastarza
Defendant:
Peter F. Neronha and Patricia A. Coyne-Fague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munir v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
Hasim Munir
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island and Paul A Suttell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maldonado v. Warden Nessinger et al
as 1:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Jesus Maldonado
Defendant:
Warden Nessinger, Major Lapore, Major Damaso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luke v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv00172
Petitioner:
Christopher Luke
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation, Warden Michael Nessinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Benbow v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Aaron Benbow
Defendant:
Patricia A. Coyne-Fague and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Nicholson et al
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Samuel Diaz
Defendant:
Lauran Nicholson, Thomas Gulick, Maureen B Keough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
