Cases 41 - 50 of 84,918
SHASTEEN v. BARTLETT
as 1:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
DAKOTA SHASTEEN
Respondent:
WARDEN BARTLETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05314
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
BURTON v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01579
Petitioner:
LAFENUS BURTON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT JOSEPH TERRA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VIERA v. BARLETT
as 1:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
WIGBERTO VIERA
Respondent:
S. BARLETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DAVIS v. CFG HEALTH SYSTEM
as 1:2024cv05232
Plaintiff:
REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTRO-MOTA v. CLARK et al.
as 2:2024cv01622
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
WARDEN TERREA MOJOR CLARK, C.O. OFFICER, LISA DURANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Reed v. Commissioner United States Parole Commission, et al
as 24-1687
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW REED, a/k/a Robert Andrew Bey
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and CHRISTOPHER WHITMER, U.S. Parole Examiner Employee
Charles Sheppard v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1697
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SHEPPARD
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Desmond et al v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Desmond and Jose Moreta
Defendant:
Robert May, Jason Schaffer, Andrew Peruchi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYGA v. PURCIELLO et al
as 2:2024cv04943
Plaintiff:
MIKE LYGA
Defendant:
STEVEN PURCIELLO and THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
