Cases 41 - 50 of 72
US v. Wallace Brown
as 12-7267
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WALLACE BROWN
US v. Amanuel Asefaw
as 12-1633
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
AMANUEL ASEFAW
Defendant:
$134,750 U. S. CURRENCY
Timothy Claridy v. US
as 12-6644
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY LEE CLARIDY
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. 4219 University Drive, Fairfax
as 12-1321
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Party In Interest:
KHOA NGUYEN
Party-in-Interest - Appellant:
DUYGU KIVANC and TURAN KIVANC
Defendant:
4219 UNIVERSITY DRIVE, FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA and $28,534.22 IN FUNDS SEIZED FROM PNC BANK ACCOUNT NO. ENDING IN 4269
US v. 121 Evan Drive, Elkton, Md
as 12-1089
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
121 EVAN DRIVE, ELKTON, MARYLAND, 21921, with all buildings, appurtenances, and improvements thereon
Claimant - Appellant:
EDWARD STEVENSON TAYLOR
US v. Charles Louther, Jr.
as 11-2244
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
CHARLES E. LOUTHER, JR.
Defendant:
CURRENCY, $41,939.00 IN U.S. and 2001 ACURA CL, VIN 19UYA42611A022790
Claimant:
SHAKITA LOUTHER and CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, INC.
US v. Avon Carroll
as 11-2197
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
AVON CARROLL
Defendant:
CURRENCY, U.S., $447,815.00
Ishia Cason v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-2134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISHIA CASON
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN, TIMOTHY GEITHNER and others
US v. Joseph Rash
as 11-2098
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH W. RASH
US v. Soledad De Avilez
as 11-1880
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
SOLEDAD LOPEZ DE AVILEZ, MATEO AVILEZ DUARTE and DON CECIL HINSON
Defendant:
JULIAN AVILEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
