Cases 41 - 50 of 641
EPPS v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 3:2021cv00018
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO JOHAN EPPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LASH v. PERKINS et al
as 1:2021cv00023
Defendant:
NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY, KENNETH ARNETT PERKINS, NATIONWIDE TRUCK LINES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LASH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JENKINS V. C R BARD INCORPORATED ET AL
as 1:2021cv00040
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
BRIDGETTE JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STARZETSKI et al v. SATA GMBH & CO KG et al
as 4:2021cv00008
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER STARZETSKI and JEVIN STARZETSKI
Defendant:
DAN-AM COMPANY, SATA GMBH & CO. KG, FINISHMASTER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
HAYES v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 5:2021cv00067
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franks v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY FRANKS
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 7:2020cv00256
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON INC
Plaintiff:
RAYFRED EVANS and SANDRA EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. BREVILLE USA INC et al
as 5:2020cv00488
Defendant:
BREVILLE USA INC and BREVILLE GROUP LIMITED
Plaintiff:
TODD MICHAEL JONES, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. COSTWAY.COM INC
as 4:2020cv00315
Defendant:
COSTWAY.COM INC doing business as COSTWAY
Plaintiff:
VALDIZ WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. BREVILLE USA INC et al
as 4:2020cv00313
Defendant:
BREVILLE USA INC and BREVILLE GROUP LIMITED
Plaintiff:
TODD MICHAEL JONES, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
