Cases 41 - 50 of 146
MALOY v. WELLS FARGO BANK NA
as 5:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F MALOY
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. CARTER et al
as 5:2015cv00094
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
PAMELA A CARTER, JOHN Q ROBERTS and JOHN SHREWSBERRY
Counter_defendant:
John Stumpf, WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and JOHN SHREWSBERRY
Counter_claimant:
JOHN Q ROBERTS and PAMELA A CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL GEORGIA INC v. OSHIOKPEKHAI et al
as 5:2015cv00068
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL GEORGIA INC
Defendant:
EVARISTUS I OSHIOKPEKHAI and SUPRIHATIN RUSMININGSIH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CARTER v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES et al
as 3:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
KILEY A CARTER
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES and DOES
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
HENRY v. HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES INC
as 5:2015cv00060
Plaintiff:
GEORGE W HENRY
Defendant:
HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MALONE et al v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
as 1:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
PAUL E MALONE, SR and FAITH LANIER MALONE
Defendant:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING et al v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
as 7:2014cv00169
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KING and KATHRYN KING
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRYANT v. CITIMORTGAGE INC
as 5:2014cv00348
Plaintiff:
EARL A BRYANT
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HILL v. ONEWEST BANK FSB et al
as 4:2014cv00121
Plaintiff:
CHERYL DENISE HILL
Defendant:
ONEWEST BANK FSB , FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and MCCURDY & CANDLER LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LEE v. BANK OF AMERICA et al
as 7:2014cv00046
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA BENTON LEE
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA , QUICKEN LOANS and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
