Cases 41 - 50 of 11,527
SMILEY v. SMITH
as 1:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Marcus Smiley
Respondent:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glass v. USP Victorville
as 1:2024cv01372
Petitioner:
Donald Glass
Defendant:
USP Victorville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Scroggins et al
as 1:2024cv01267
Petitioner:
Tiki Sims
Respondent:
Warden Steven Scroggins and Screven County Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lackey v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv01259
Petitioner:
James E. Lackey
Respondent:
Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ingram v. Adams
as 1:2024cv01298
Petitioner:
Herman Ingram
Respondent:
Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carruth v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv01294
Petitioner:
Terrence Carruth
Respondent:
John or Jane Doe and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunn v. Janson
as 1:2024cv01296
Petitioner:
George Washington Dunn
Respondent:
Sean Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Paschal v. Augusta State Medical Prison
as 1:2024cv01323
Petitioner:
Charles A. Paschal, Jr.
Respondent:
Augusta State Medical Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Obeginski v. Walker
as 1:2024cv00502
Petitioner:
AARON OBEGINSKI
Respondent:
Victor Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
