Cases 41 - 50 of 140,550
Perrone v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyne Perrone and Gwendolyn Perrone
Defendant:
Tony D. Smith and Wytheville Auto and Truck Repair LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Park v. USA
as 5:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Christopher Louis Park
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Smith v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Smith
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
VanNote v. Jackson County Magistrate Court et al
as 2:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Timothy VanNote
Defendant:
Jackson County Magistrate Court and Jackson County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00189
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stevens et al v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Stevens and Nicholas VanBuren
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Beth Waugh, Dustyn Isner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham et al v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Arnette Cunningham and Madelyn Ruth Cunningham
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clark v. Dankwa et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Brent Clark
Defendant:
Doctor Vibeke Dankwa and Patricia Corbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
