Social Security Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 19,979
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by filed date
PLEASANT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv04832
Plaintiff: MELVIN A PLEASANT
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CAMPBELL, JR. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04791
Plaintiff: MARK J CAMPBELL, JR.
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CLARK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04732
Plaintiff: MARY KIM CLARK
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ARMONE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04736
Plaintiff: LOLITA ARMONE
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DEVINE v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01480
Plaintiff: DANIEL J. DEVINE
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MASTROGIOVANNI v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv01492
Plaintiff: DAVID JOHN MASTROGIOVANNI
Defendant: MARTIN OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CHATHAM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00107
Plaintiff: CARRIE ANN CHATHAM
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Miller v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00617
Plaintiff: Diane L. Miller
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mattey Pinchalk v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff: Joanne Mattey Pinchalk
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
GIORGIANNI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv04670
Plaintiff: JOSEPH GIORGIANNI
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?