Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 51 - 60 of 26,263
WYMER v. DOE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00055
Plaintiff: JAMES WYMER
Defendant: JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MINDEN PICTURES INC v. REHABMART LLC
as 3:2024cv00013
Plaintiff: MINDEN PICTURES INC
Defendant: REHABMART LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
ANDERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2024cv00050
Petitioner: KYRIMA ANDERSON
Respondent: STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant: Warden JACOB BEASLEY, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Warden BRIAN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MADDOX v. MIMS et al
as 5:2024cv00110
Plaintiff: VIRGIL LAMAR MADDOX
Defendant: CHARLES MIMS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILCOX v. WALTON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff: ANTAVIUS TEAZIA WILCOX
Defendant: WALTON COUNTY JAIL and CORRECT HEALTH MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?