Cases 51 - 60 of 6,393
Perry v. Alves
as 1:2023cv13028
Petitioner:
Frederick Perry
Respondent:
Nelson B Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Latham v. Hurley et al
as 1:2024cv10130
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Defendant:
Tina Hurley, Charlene Bonner, Tonomey Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piard v. Arsenault
as 4:2023cv40165
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Erica Arsenault
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Divris et al
as 1:2024cv10089
Plaintiff:
Timothy Barker
Defendant:
Matthew Divris, Anthony Findley and Joe Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duarte v. Commonwealth et al
as 1:2023cv12678
Plaintiff:
Eric J Duarte
Defendant:
Commonwealth, Norfolk County, Sheriff Patrick W McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunn v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE 1:20-cr-10198-FDS-4
as 1:2023cv13206
Petitioner:
Patrick Dunn
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gomez Portorreal v. USA - DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. ALL PLEADINGS TO BE FILED in 22cr10156-PBS.
as 1:2023cv13169
Petitioner:
Santiago Gomez Portorreal
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Nguyen v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE 95-cr-10266-DPW
as 1:2023cv13152
Petitioner:
Minh Hung Nguyen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12525
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Larson v. Napier
as 1:2023cv12817
Petitioner:
Thomas Larson
Respondent:
Napier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
