General Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 66,336
Monroe v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00237
Plaintiff: Gregory Zachary Monroe
Defendant: Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weaver v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00238
Petitioner: Joseph Weaver
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shilling v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00039
Petitioner: Ryan Joel Shilling
Respondent: FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ellis v. USA
as 6:2024cv00099
Plaintiff: Curtis Lee Ellis
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00040
Petitioner: Jerry Dean Smith, Jr
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Greer v. Lumpkin
as 24-50186
Petitioner: Otis Greer
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00101
Petitioner: Wendell Harrison
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00268
Petitioner: Stephen Wayne Richardson
Respondent: Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00096
Petitioner: Richard James Johnson
Respondent: Sheriff Larry R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alonso v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00968
Petitioner: Ralph Ernest Alonso
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?