Cases 61 - 70 of 80,534
Hipp v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03026
Plaintiff:
Zachary Thomas Hipp
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Berretta v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Albert Berretta
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Portillo et al v. CoStar Group Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Portillo, Alicia Coakley, Freddy Barajas and others
Defendant:
CoStar Group, Inc., Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc., Hyatt Hotels Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Simon Haines v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00543
Petitioner:
Simon Unsworth Haines
Respondent:
Amazon.com Services LLC and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Rowley v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00538
Petitioner:
Ryan Rowley
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00539
Petitioner:
Tayan Jackson
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Norton v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00540
Petitioner:
Daniel Norton
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Navarette v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00541
Petitioner:
Jorge J Navarette
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Foletti v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00542
Petitioner:
Fredrick D Foletti
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reevis v. Spokane County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
Spokane County Superior Court, US District Court, US Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
