Cases 71 - 80 of 2,902
Harris v. FRANKLIN MINT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 1:2023cv12891
Plaintiff:
Michael Harris
Defendant:
Franklin Mint Federal Credit Union
THOMPSON v. FRANKLIN MINT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 1:2023cv12885
Plaintiff:
TINA THOMPSON
Defendant:
Franklin Mint Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Rhodes v. Columbia Banking Systems Inc
as 1:2024cv10036
Plaintiff:
Roberts Rhodes
Defendant:
Columbia Banking Systems Inc doing business as Umpqua Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Canterbury v. Performance Health Technology, Ltd.
as 1:2024cv10035
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Canterbury
Defendant:
Performance Health Technology, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Amguard Insurance Company v. New England Mechanical Services Inc.
as 1:2023cv00462
Defendant:
New England Mechanical Services Inc., Amguard Insurance Company and NEMSI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Strucke et al v. Midland Financial Co et al
as 1:2023cv12771
Plaintiff:
Darryl Strucke
Defendant:
Midland Financial Co, Ipswitch Inc and Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Depoian v. Berger
as 1:2023cv13063
Plaintiff:
Sarah Depoian
Defendant:
Merle Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mercado v. Carrington et al
as 1:2024cv10003
Plaintiff:
Leslie Mercado
Defendant:
Alfred Carrington and Vida Carrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Williams
as 1:2023cv13191
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Williams
Defendant:
Rayon Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Harris v. Pension Benefit Information, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv12816
Plaintiff:
Kelly Harris
Defendant:
Pension Benefit Information, LLC doing business as PBI Research Services and Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
