Cases 71 - 80 of 29,355
Tipton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01654
Plaintiff:
William Tipton
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramos v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01644
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Ramos
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Andrews et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv10897
Plaintiff:
Gerald E. Andrews, Mary Margaret Baker, John Franklin Bishop and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Church v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01616
Plaintiff:
John Church
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01611
Plaintiff:
Chloette Nelson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johns v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01617
Plaintiff:
Karen Johns
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hargis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01590
Plaintiff:
Janet Hargis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01604
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Brown
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tague v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
Harold Tague
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rose v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01608
Plaintiff:
Jason Rose
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
