Cases 71 - 80 of 34,922
Woods v. Cadle et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Anthony Woods
Defendant:
Lindsey Cadle, Apryl Bradshaw, Tonia McFarland Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Unknown Party #1
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Phillips
Defendant:
Unknown Party #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Julie A. Su v Danby Products, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Danby Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ware v. Mayfield City School District Board of Education
as 1:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
Crystal Ware
Defendant:
Mayfield City School District Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe #034 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
John Joe #034 and John Doe #034
Defendant:
William - Lee, David B. Rausch and William Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Kim Hodges v. Joseph Abram, et al
as 24-1300
Plaintiff:
KIM HODGES, personal representative for the estate of Michael Donte Molson
Defendant:
JOSEPH ABRAM, BRAXTON CROWDER, Deputy, JASON KELLEY, Lieutenant and others
Perusse v. Barstow Community Hospital
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Kathy Perusse
Defendant:
Barstow Community Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Jade Pig Ventures - River Ridge LLC v. Walker, City of
as 1:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Jade Pig Ventures - River Ridge LLC
Defendant:
Walker, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Other Civil Rights
Davis v. Alliance Mobile
as 2:2024cv10943
Plaintiff:
Amy Davis
Defendant:
Alliance Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Milledge-McCary v. Trusted Resource Associates et al
as 2:2024cv10944
Plaintiff:
Angel Milledge-McCary
Defendant:
Trusted Resource Associates and Tenet Healthcare Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
