Cases 71 - 80 of 15,533
Paget v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03049
Plaintiff:
Devon Elizabeth Paget
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Northwest Restoration Operating Inc v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Northwest Restoration Operating Inc
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Nowels et al
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Burke
Defendant:
John T Nowels, State of Washington Attorney General and Spokane County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larsen v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05035
Plaintiff:
Cheyann Larsen
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
United States of America v. Taylor
as 4:2024cv05034
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Donald J Taylor
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Church of the Gardens et al v. O'Rourke et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Reevis v. Spokane County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
Spokane County Superior Court, Supreme Court United States and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
