Cases 71 - 79 of 79
INTERNATIONAL STEEL GROUP, INC. v. BODMAN et al
as 1:2005cv00817
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Con Edison Co NY Inc, et al v. Bodman, Samuel W., et al
as 05-5089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Long Island Lighting Company, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Spencer Abraham, Secretary of Energy, United States
Defendant - Appellee:
Samuel W. Bodman, Secretary of Energy, United States and George B. Breznay, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals of U.S. Department of Energy
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. et al v. ABRAHAM et al
as 1:2004cv01732
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0751 Economic Stabilization Act of 1970
Porter v. Collection Recovery Bureau
as 3:2004cv00026
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. et al v. ABRAHAM et al
as 1:2004cv00382
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. et al v. BODMAN et al
as 1:2003cv01991
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kalodner, Philip v. Abraham, Spencer, et al
as 01-5339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Philip P. Kalodner
Defendant - Appellee:
Spencer Abraham, Secretary of Energy, United States, Lee Liberman Otis, General Counsel, George B. Breznay, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Eric J. Fygi, Acting General Counsel
Con Edison Co NY Inc, et al v. Ashcroft, John D., et al
as 01-5107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Long Island Lighting Company and Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States and Ruth A. Harvey, Attorney, Civil Division, Department of State
Cook, et al v. Rockwell Intl Corp
as 1:1990cv00181
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
