Cases 71 - 80 of 10,359
SULLIVAN v. WARD et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
MARIO ROMOAN SULLIVAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WARDEN WALTER BARRY, WARDEN DARRIN MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITED v. GAINES et al
as 7:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
DESHAWN THOMAS WHITED
Defendant:
GAINES, BLACKSHEAR, FOLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANNESS v. BAILEY
as 4:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
KEVIS VANNESS and KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant:
BRIAN BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
KEVIS VAN NESS
Respondent:
Sheriff GREGORY COUNTRYMAN and MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant:
Sheriff GREGORY COUNTRYMAN, Lieutenant HARBERT, Sgt MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00077
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SNYDER v. SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
ERIC EUGENE SNYDER, SR
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, BORIUDIN, LIEUTENANT BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRYOR v. DOOLY STATE PRISON, et al
as 5:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
ERIK E PRYOR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, NURSE ARMSTRONG and NURSE ALTMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
