Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 71 - 80 of 71,048
GAUVIN v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00343
Petitioner: MICHELLE GAUVIN
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BUIS et al v. GONZALEZ et al
as 1:2024cv00322
Plaintiff: JAMES BUIS and ANGELA BUIS
Defendant: LEONEL GONZALEZ and ROEHL TRANSPORT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
TUGGLE v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00323
Plaintiff: BRYAN TUGGLE
Defendant: DENNIS REAGLE and OBADIAH SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL, INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff: DEJAUNE L. ANDERSON and PRINCESS CALIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY II
Defendant: WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00318
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
VICE v. ARPIP DELIVER, LLC
as 1:2024cv00314
Plaintiff: David Vice
Defendant: Arpip Deliver, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HATTON v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00668
Petitioner: TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUTH-BRADLEY v. SIPICH et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff: JOSEPH JAMES RUTH-BRADLEY
Defendant: CARRIE SIPICH, DERRIK HOBBS, FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. AKANDE et al
as 1:2024cv00667
Plaintiff: MARQUESE BERRY
Defendant: AKANDE, JAIL COMMANDER, ADEOJO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COVINGTON v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2024cv00665
Plaintiff: RONALD COVINGTON
Defendant: WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?