Cases 71 - 80 of 1,407
ELGASIM MOHAMED FADLALLA, ET AL v. WESTERN MAIN ACCOUNTING SERVICES LLC
as 2:2022mc00081
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
CAREY v. ETRADE INC
as 2:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
SETH T CAREY
Defendant:
ETRADE INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
LUNT DRESSER et al v. NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DEVELOPERS et al
as 2:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
JAY P LUNT DRESSER, SIERRA CLUB OF PORTLAND MAINE, SIERRA CLUB OF MAINE and others
Defendant:
DEVELOPERS OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and others
MANHART v. LITITZ MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2021cv00335
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
SULLIVAN et al v. CHESTER WATER AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
GREGORY B SULLIVAN
Defendant:
CHESTER WATER AUTHORITY, JUDGE DOMINIC PILEGGI, EEOC PHILADELPHIA OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. QUALEY EXCAVATION INC
as 1:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
QUALEY EXCAVATION INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
AHSAN et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMED AHSAN and NASIR AHMEED
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and TOM VILSACK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ANSON & MADISON WATER DISTRICT v. CORSON
as 1:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
ANSON & MADISON WATER DISTRICT
Defendant:
MICHAEL CORSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IDEXX LABORATORIES INC v. BILBROUGH et al
as 2:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
IDEXX LABORATORIES INC
Defendant:
GRAHAM BILBROUGH and MELISSA LAPOINTE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
