Cases 71 - 80 of 16,344
T.F. v. Gerber Products Company et al
as 4:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
T.F.
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company, Nestle S.A., Beech-Nut Nutrition Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lightfoot v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Lightfoot
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Smith et al v. Sansone Group, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Carla Smith, Claude Lacy Jr. and Claude Lacy, Jr.
Defendant:
Sansone Group LLC, Metropolitan Village Apartments, LP, Sansone Group, LLC and others
Moran v. John Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Ryan Moran
Defendant:
John Doe and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. doing business as FedEx Ground
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Whatley v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Samuel Whatley
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Malcolm v. Wardrip et al
as 4:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Felicia Malcolm
Defendant:
Junior Wardrip and VRC Companies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Gautney v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv05012
Plaintiff:
Billy Dean Gautney and Tommy Yarbrough Estate of
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Ramirez v. Menard Inc.
as 2:2024cv04039
Plaintiff:
Angela Ramirez
Defendant:
Menard Inc. doing business as Menards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Smith v. Starbucks Corporation
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Amber Smith
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hammer v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
DeVon Hammer
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
