Cases 71 - 80 of 14,054
Gautreaux v. Warden, SPC Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Jase Depaul Gautreaux
Respondent:
Warden, SPC Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bohon v. Walmart Stores East, LP et al
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Robin Lynn Bohon and Daniel Gonzales
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, LP, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Hughes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Maria Hughes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mey v. Pintas et al
as 5:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Diana Mey
Defendant:
William Pintas, P&M Law Firm, LLC, P&M Law Firm (PR), LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
James v. Lovett
as 5:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Calvin James
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Moore v. Jupiter Aluminum Corporation
as 5:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Virgil H. Moore
Defendant:
Jupiter Aluminum Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Carter-EL v. Ray et al
as 3:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
George E. Carter-EL
Respondent:
H.L. Ray and Mr. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Neuhoff v. Bayless
as 5:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Colecius Neuhoff
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 5:2054cv00053
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
