Cases 81 - 90 of 80,210
Bess v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01829
Plaintiff:
Tina Bess
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wellborn v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01827
Plaintiff:
Michael Wellborn
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henderson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01832
Plaintiff:
Robert Henderson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01834
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Thomas
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kennerly v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01837
Plaintiff:
Douglas Kennerly
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Horak et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01810
Plaintiff:
Norma Horak and Joseph Horak
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01816
Plaintiff:
Alisa K Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kademian v. Magdinec et al
as 2:2024cv01821
Plaintiff:
Monique Kademian
Defendant:
Ryan P Magdinec, Solta Medical, Inc., Bausch Health Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Conrad v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01819
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Mary F. Conrad
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bibb v. The U.S. District Court Judge Edmund J. Sargus's Court
as 2:2024cv01808
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Bibb
Defendant:
The U.S. District Court Judge Edmund J. Sargus's Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
