Cases 1 - 10 of 153,328
Bacus v. 23andMe, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02288
Plaintiff:
Michelle Bacus
Defendant:
23andMe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Syndio Solutions, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02316
Plaintiff:
Syndio Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc. and X Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Hurst v. Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream Inc
as 4:2024cv02314
Plaintiff:
Ramon Hurst
Defendant:
Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Mattatall v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2024cv02315
Plaintiff:
Samuel Mattatall
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Trevillion et al v. St. Joseph Health Northern California, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02221
Plaintiff:
Kim Y. Trevillion and John W. Chaffin
Defendant:
St. Joseph Health Northern California, LLC doing business as Providence St. Joseph Hospital-Eureka and Dr. Carlos Eduardo Rodriguez Castro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Peralta v. Citi Bank et al
as 3:2024cv02267
Plaintiff:
Lizbeth Peralta
Defendant:
Citi Bank and DOes Military Contractor
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Austin v. Kia America, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
George Jarvis Austin
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc., Epiq Global, Susan Illston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
