Cases 61 - 70 of 12,222
Osborne v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Kelly Lee Osborne
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rackham v. State of Idaho
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Rackham
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Kathy Robertson
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Sierra Club v. City of Boise
as 1:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club
Defendant:
City of Boise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Feusi v. Centurion of Idaho, LLC, et al.
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
David Feusi
Defendant:
Centurion of Idaho, LLC, Dr. Kate Wilks, Chad Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oasis International Group, LTD. et al v. Intermountain Precious Metals, LLC
as 1:2024cv00171
Petitioner:
Oasis International Group, LTD. and Satellite Holdings Company
Respondent:
Intermountain Precious Metals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
SGT. Ramirez, Aaron Fodge, R. Findeisen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Micron Technology, Inc. et al v. Netlist, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Micron Technology, Inc. and Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Netlist, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
