Cases 1 - 10 of 28
United States of America v. Med Plus Staffing LLC
as 4:2021cv00014
Defendant:
Med Plus Staffing LLC
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dudley, Sr. v. MO Health Net et al
as 4:2019cv00129
Defendant:
Swope Park Way Clinic, MO Health Net and Walgreens
Plaintiff:
Gene E. Dudley, Sr.
Physicians Home Health Infusion, P.C. v. UnitedHealthcare of the Midwest, Inc.
as 4:2018cv01959
Defendant:
UnitedHealthcare of the Midwest, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Physicians Home Health Infusion, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mendota Insurance Company v. Winburn et al
as 2:2018cv04213
Defendant:
Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Consumer Adjustment Company, Inc. d/b/a CACi and John Winburn
Plaintiff:
Mendota Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1394
Jurchin v. Luebbering
as 4:2017cv02509
Plaintiff:
Claude Henton Jurchin
Defendant:
Patric Luebbering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Emmons, et al
as 1:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Allstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.
Defendant:
Brandon Emmons , Tucker Emmons, Tye Emmons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Triple A Home Care Agency, Inc. v. Burwell
as 4:2015cv00668
Plaintiff:
Triple A Home Care Agency, Inc.
Defendant:
Sylvia Burwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345
SSM Managed Care Organization, LLC v. RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc.
as 4:2014cv01980
Plaintiff:
SSM Managed Care Organization, LLC
Defendant:
RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Medicare et al
as 4:2013cv00735
Plaintiff:
Edna Anderson
Defendant:
Medicare and Medicaid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345 Medicare Recovery
Lanzotti & Rau, LLC v. Sebelius et al
as 1:2013cv00085
Plaintiff:
Lanzotti & Rau, LLC
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Richard Callahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345 Medicare Recovery
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
