Cases 11 - 20 of 6,333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dean v. The City of Saint Louis Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Alexandra M. Dean
Defendant:
The City of Saint Louis Sheriffs Office, Neil Hogan, George Allen Crouch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Keys v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armes v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jacob B. Armes
Defendant:
United States of America and Jennifer Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Woods v. City of St. Ann, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Michelle Woods
Defendant:
City of St. Ann, Missouri, Aaron Jimenez, Stefan Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
