Cases 11 - 20 of 573
Su v. Pride Auto Detailing LLC, et al
as 6:2023cv03368
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Pride Auto Detailing LLC doing business as Pride Auto Detailing and Desmond Morris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bruders et al v. KC Concessionaire, LLC
as 4:2023cv00882
Plaintiff:
Brad Bruders and Brent Bruders
Defendant:
KC Concessionaire, LLC
Stevens v. U-Haul Company of Missouri
as 6:2023cv03380
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Stevens
Defendant:
U-Haul Company of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Su v. Family Garden Inc
as 6:2023cv03359
Defendant:
Family Garden Inc a Missouri corporation doing business as Asian King Buffet formerly known as Great Garden Springfield Inc and Great Garden Springfield Inc
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Seals v. Gully Transportation, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00824
Plaintiff:
Shawn Seals
Defendant:
Gully Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Failure to Pay Earned Compensation
Gilbert v. The Lund Company
as 4:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Dustin Gilbert
Defendant:
The Lund Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Burrow v. Thornton Investments LLC, et al
as 2:2023cv04193
Plaintiff:
Cory Burrow
Defendant:
Thornton Investments LLC doing business as Torque Motorsports, Brandon Thornton and Tosha Thornton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Su v. WONP51, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
WONP51, LLC, Pizza 51, LLC, Jason Pryor and others
Lalanda v. John J. Connell Co., Inc.
as 6:2023cv03286
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Lalanda
Defendant:
John J. Connell Co., Inc. doing business as Connell Material Handling
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lucero v. Atomic Provisions LLC
as 4:2023cv00603
Plaintiff:
Lauren Lucero
Defendant:
Atomic Provisions LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
