Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Missouri
Cases 41 - 50 of 20,678
Bush v. Stange
as 6:2024cv03101
Petitioner: Jordan Bush
Respondent: Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00518
Petitioner: Daniel Henderson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Clay v. Western Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv06051
Plaintiff: DaRon Clay
Defendant: Western Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00068
Petitioner: Antione Johnson
Defendant: Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arita v. USA
as 4:2024cv00249
Petitioner: Yader J Arita
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hutson v. Vandergriff
as 2:2024cv04051
Petitioner: Calvin Hutson
Respondent: David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nanney v. Hurst et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Petitioner: Eric Scott Nanney
Defendant: Emma Hurst, Caroline Moyers, 32nd Division Circuit Court of Bollinger County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Centurion LLC et al
as 5:2024cv06048
Plaintiff: Zachary D Lee
Defendant: Centurion LLC, WRDCC Medical Staff, Nurse Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotter v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff: Daniel Trotter
Defendant: Wendy Marie Miller, Whithney Conney, Howard Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glasgow v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03092
Plaintiff: Shannon M Glasgow
Defendant: State of Missouri, Local Officials, Federal Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?