Cases 1 - 10 of 601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Softwho et al v. Microsoft Incorporated et al
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Softwho and Mr. Joseph Andrew Stanford
Defendant:
Microsoft Incorporated, Cisco Systems Incorporated, IRS Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Almer v. Hanson et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Almer
Defendant:
Justin Hanson, Ronald Kind, Laif Rognlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Baasch v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jared Michael Baasch
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Stanford v. Microsoft Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Stanford
Defendant:
Microsoft Inc., Cisco Systems Inc., Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sanderson
as 3:2024cv00022
Not Yet Classified:
Bev Demers
Petitioner:
Mitchell S. Sanderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
