Cases 11 - 20 of 835
Shaff et al v. Claymore et al
as 3:2023cv03029
Plaintiff:
Sarah Shaff and Keith Fodness
Defendant:
Judge Brenda Claymore, Judge Margaret Egan and Charles Red Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Viet Family, Inc. v. Freidel et al
as 4:2023cv04186
Plaintiff:
Viet Family, Inc. doing business as Nextgen AG Lime
Defendant:
Thomas A. Freidel, Thomas J. Freidel and Timothy Freidel
Taki & DA PTE LTD v. Citibank N.A.
as 4:2023cv04163
Plaintiff:
Taki & DA PTE LTD
Defendant:
Citibank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wilson et al v. Department of Interior et al
as 5:2022cv05097
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Bolzer v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv05044
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Loud Hawk v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv05045
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Warnke v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv03024
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Finneman v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 5:2023cv05034
Plaintiff:
David Finneman
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Risk Managment Agency and Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Alverson et al v. Spink County, South Dakota et al
as 3:2022cv03023
Plaintiff:
Ronald Alverson and SCS Carbon Transport LLC
Defendant:
Spink County, South Dakota, Spink County Board of Commissioners, Brett Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wilson v. Department of Interior et al
as 5:2023cv05041
Plaintiff:
Melaine R. Wilson
Defendant:
Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs - Washington D.C., Bureau of Indian Affairs - Pine Ridge Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
