Cases 11 - 20 of 97
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 3:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Kara Pratt, Texas Supreme Court, Texas Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Edgerton et al v. George et al
as 3:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Juan Edgerton, Djuan Edgerton and Tamira Edgerton
Defendant:
Gregory George and PCF Franchise LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Schuchardt v. Bloomberg, L.P. et al
as 3:2022cv01017
Plaintiff:
Elliott J. Schuchardt
Defendant:
Bloomberg, L.P., Roy Strom and Bloomberg Industry Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Ward et al v. Ervin
as 3:2022cv00766
Plaintiff:
Justin Ward and Encore Luxury Coaches, LLC
Defendant:
Kylee Ervin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Sharp v. Carr et al
as 3:2022cv00905
Plaintiff:
Robert Sharp
Defendant:
John Dustin Carr and Charles Consiglio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Kirkendoll v. Dollar General et al
as 3:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Annalesha Kirkendoll
Defendant:
Dollar General and Kelly l/n/u
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Assault, Libel & Slander
McKenna v. Dillon Transportation, LLC
as 3:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Frank McKenna
Defendant:
Dillon Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Thompson v. Stephens
as 3:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Connor Thompson
Defendant:
Maggie Lee Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Theodoro et al v. Middlesex Hospital et al
as 3:2021cv00861
Plaintiff:
Isabella Theodoro and Peter Theodoro
Defendant:
Middlesex Hospital, Ahmet Semh Gork, Anne S. Bingham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stone v. Moore
as 3:2021cv00794
Plaintiff:
Michael Raymond Stone
Defendant:
Russell Dwayne Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
