Cases 51 - 60 of 196
McClain v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01419
Plaintiff:
Dianna R. McClain
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilcox v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2017cv01202
Plaintiff:
Nichole Wilcox
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kerr v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv01183
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Kerr
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dorris v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv01182
Plaintiff:
Anna Dorris
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lovell v. Howmedic Osteonics d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics et al
as 3:2017cv01168
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Lovell
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics , Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tate v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 3:2017cv00981
Plaintiff:
Andranette Tate
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and Astrazeneca LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Milam et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ray F. Milam and Jennifer Milam
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson-Fairbanks v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00713
Plaintiff:
Stacy Wilson-Fairbanks
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bell v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00664
Plaintiff:
Trace Bell
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts et al v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 3:2016cv03168
Plaintiff:
Karen Roberts and Suzette Curtis
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
