Cases 51 - 60 of 1,559
Santiago v. Davidson County Sheriff's et al
as 3:2023cv00400
Petitioner:
Edwin Santiago, Jr.
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's and DDC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ruby-Ruiz v. Davidson County Criminal Court
as 3:2023cv00274
Petitioner:
Ugenio Dejesus Ruby-Ruiz
Respondent:
Davidson County Criminal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayson v. Martin
as 3:2023cv00351
Petitioner:
Ricky Lane Grayson
Respondent:
Frink Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mosley v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00386
Petitioner:
Bobby James Mosley, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Webb v. Cox
as 2:2023cv00020
Petitioner:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Respondent:
Sheriff Casey Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Townsend v. Leeds et al
as 3:2023cv00220
Petitioner:
Alfonso Townsend
Respondent:
Warden f/n/u Leeds and Core Civic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avila-Salazar v. Perry, Warden
as 3:2023cv00189
Petitioner:
Alejandro Avila-Salazar
Respondent:
Grady Perry, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Vantell et al
as 3:2023cv00375
Petitioner:
Jerome Williams
Defendant:
Vince Vantell and Jonathan Skrmetti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. State of Tennessee, T.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
George Coleman
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, T.D.O.C., Lisa Hilton and Tennessee Board of Parole and Probation The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gutierrez v. Clendenion
as 1:2023cv00010
Petitioner:
Jonathan Gutierrez
Defendant:
Jason Clendenion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
