Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,548
Reynoso v. Welch et al
as 1:2024cv03053
Plaintiff: Jose Reynoso
Defendant: Welch, Joseph Brusic and Lisa Rapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bodhi v. Strange et al
as 4:2024cv05039
Plaintiff: Bodhi
Defendant: Cheryl Strange, Lisa Flynn, Dawn Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bone v. Yakima County Department of Corrections Food Services et al
as 1:2024cv03052
Plaintiff: Broderick J Bone
Defendant: Yakima County Department of Corrections Food Services and Aramark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00117
Petitioner: Joe L Garrison
Respondent: No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00118
Petitioner: Joe L Garrison
Respondent: No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melton v. USPTO et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff: Kenneth David Melton
Defendant: USPTO, LexisNexis and Google Chrome Extensions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huezo v. Haynes
as 4:2024cv05037
Petitioner: Juan Luna Huezo
Respondent: Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff: Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff: Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff: Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?