Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Cases 31 - 40 of 15,519
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00117
Petitioner: Joe L Garrison
Respondent: No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00118
Petitioner: Joe L Garrison
Respondent: No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Key Tronic Corporation v. Fio Corporation
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff: Key Tronic Corporation
Defendant: Fio Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Melton v. USPTO et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff: Kenneth David Melton
Defendant: USPTO, LexisNexis and Google Chrome Extensions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. O'Malley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv05021
Plaintiff: Tianna Brooks
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00112
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marino v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05036
Plaintiff: Jeramie Marino
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Franklin v. JR Simplot Company et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff: Jordan J Franklin
Defendant: Simplot US Food Group Holdings LLC, JR Simplot Company and Unknown John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Tompson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05022
Plaintiff: Jamie Tompson
Defendant: Martin O'Malley and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Serrano v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03020
Plaintiff: Angel Serrano
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?