Cases 1 - 10 of 6,746
Hicks v. Lexis Nexis
as 2:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Merylynn Hicks
Defendant:
Lexis Nexis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Pennington v. Taylor et al
as 4:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Pennington, Jr
Defendant:
Calvin Taylor and Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 American Disability Act
Bradley v. Bevis et al
as 4:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Thaibiti Bradley
Defendant:
David Bevis, Toben and Russellville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Doe et al v. Dardanelle School District et al
as 4:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Sally Doe
Defendant:
Dardanelle School District, Arthur J Gallagher & Company - Little Rock, Nicholas Rolando Valls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Dollar v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Dollar
Defendant:
Derek Adams, Chasta Harrison and Van Buren County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Miller v. Department of Human Services
as 4:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Miller
Defendant:
Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
