Cases 31 - 40 of 19,558
EMRIT v. ROBERTS et al
as 3:2024cv04653
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS, JUSTICE BRETT KAVANAUGH, JUSTICE SAMUEL ALITO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. RIVAS et al
as 3:2024cv04730
Plaintiff:
MARIAH SMITH
Defendant:
ALBERTO RIVAS, CHRISTINE HEITTMANN, LAURINE BETANCOURT NELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. ADOCHIO et al
as 3:2024cv04729
Plaintiff:
MARIAH SMITH
Defendant:
ROBERT M. ADOCHIO, SHEILA ANGELLA REID, MARLINA PAPOTTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
NAFTALOVICH v. U.S. SUPREME COURT
as 2:2024cv04610
Plaintiff:
DANIEL NAFTALOVICH
Defendant:
U.S. SUPREME COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
SIMMONS
as 2:2024cv04537
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R.G. SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOODWIN v. CITY OF PATERSON, et al.
as 2:2024cv04544
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION et al v. PRECISELY HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04571
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, JANE DOE-1, JANE DOE-2 and others
Defendant:
PRECISELY HOLDINGS, LLC, PRECISELY SOFTWARE INC., PRECISELY SOFTWARE LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
