Cases 61 - 70 of 18,881
ALLURE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv03820
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ALLURE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, C.O. BRYAN SINGLETON and NURSE JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv03935
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RIVERA
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and DR. IBRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. MONICOLLO et al
as 3:2024cv03937
Plaintiff:
DYSHUN DURHAM
Defendant:
OFFICER MONICOLLO and DR. HASHMI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BADU v. CHARLES
as 2:2024cv03931
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BADU
Defendant:
WARDEN RON CHARLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
DUBOSE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2024cv03768
Petitioner:
ZUMAR H. DUBOSE
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN et al v. HUDSON COUNTY NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2024cv03948
Plaintiff:
TORELL BROWN and NAIM ALLEN
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY NEW JERSEY, BECKY SCOTT and MAXIM CASAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02900
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
STEVENS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv03122
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVENS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, CASTRO and WELLPATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOMINGUEZ v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FT. DIX
as 1:2024cv02743
Petitioner:
JOEL LEOVALDO DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FT. DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
