Cases 51 - 60 of 10,924
Webb v. Carter et al
as 3:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Dearion Webb
Defendant:
CoreCivil/Medical, (f/n/u) Carter and (f/n/u) Jacobe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peoples v. United States of America, The
as 3:2024cv00385
Petitioner:
Marquel Peoples
Respondent:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Norris v. CoreCivic et al
as 3:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Joseph Norris
Defendant:
CoreCivic and Lorina Poe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Derwin Valentino Thomas
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Sumner County et al
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Kevin Baker
Defendant:
Sumner County, Gary #455 and Bouchard #534
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beeler, Jr. v. Goin
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Peter Steven Beeler, Jr.
Defendant:
Curtis Goin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooten et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Angular Wooten and Leroy Wooten
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Harrell et al
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ellis
Defendant:
f/n/u Harrell, Rutherford County Jail and Rutherford County Shirfe Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartley v. Cate et al
as 3:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Hartley
Defendant:
Nathan Cate, Criminal Court Clerk's Office, Central Records Division (Metro Police Department) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barry v. Sumner County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Devin T. Barry
Defendant:
Sumner County Jail, Certeza, Byrn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
