Cases 61 - 70 of 9,391
Doe #1 (LWB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (LWB), John Doe #2 (DBB) and John Doe #3 (BAR)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CenturyLink Communications, LLC v. Catellus Fiber Optics, LLC
as 3:2024cv00181
Petitioner:
CenturyLink Communications, LLC
Respondent:
Catellus Fiber Optics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
C.A.T. Global Inc. v. Honeybee Transporation, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
C.A.T. Global Inc.
Defendant:
Honeybee Transporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 The Carmack Amendment
Shoneys North America, LLC v. Young & Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Shoney's North America, LLC
Defendant:
Young & Associates, Inc., Young & Associates, Inc. of Virginia, Kevin J. Young and others
Williams v. Knox County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGowan v. City of LaVergne, Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Henry Ty McGowan
Defendant:
City of LaVergne, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Fair Debt Collection Act
Doe (DJB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
John Doe (DJB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robidoux v. Capital Accounts, LLC
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
MEAGAN ROBIDOUX
Defendant:
CAPITAL ACCOUNTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McCain v. Fitzgerald
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Tyler McCain
Defendant:
Bryan Fitzgerald doing business as Marathon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
