Cases 11 - 20 of 52
40 Days for Life of Wausau et al v. Illick, Ralph et al
as 3:2011cv00231
Plaintiff:
40 Days for Life of Wausau , Theresa Whitaker , Janet Kraimer-Nichols and others
Defendant:
Ralph Illick , Marathon County Public Library , Tim Gierl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClendon v. Aurora Public Library
as 1:2010cv08092
Plaintiff:
Juyrone McClendon
Defendant:
Aurora Public Library
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chaffee v. San Francisco Library Commission et al
as 3:2010cv04521
Plaintiff:
James Chaffee
Defendant:
San Francisco Library Commission and City and County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chaffee v. San Francisco Library Commission et al
as 4:2010cv04521
Plaintiff:
James Chaffee
Defendant:
San Francisco Library Commission and City and County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mendes v. Brown et al
as 3:2010cv00397
Plaintiff:
Lynn Ellen Mendes
Defendant:
Charles Brown and Charlotte Mecklenburg Public Library
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott E. Pombrio v. A. Villaragosa et al
as 2:2010cv05604
Defendant:
City-County of Los Angeles, Does Ten, Inclusive, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Scott E Pombrio
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00919
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
James Pietrangelo, II v. Sandusky Library, et al
as 10-3843
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. PIETRANGELO, II
Defendant - Appellee:
SANDUSKY LIBRARY, TERRI ESTEL, CITY OF SANDUSKY, OHIO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
