District Court Cases in West Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 140,699
Pinion v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Pinion
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
AT&T Mobility, LLC v. City of Wheeling, West Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Defendant:
City of Wheeling, West Virginia and The City of Wheeling Planning Commission
Fitzpatrick v. McKnight
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Brandon Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Daniel McKnight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Lovette
as 3:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Dallas Ford
Respondent:
Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Eldridge v. Antonelli
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
David Lee Eldridge
Defendant:
Bryan M. Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Richardson-Brown v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00285
Petitioner:
LaTonya Richardson-Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ashley et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
James Ashley and Patricia Ashley
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Neal v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Neal, II
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
