District Court Cases in Tennessee

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 88,901
Hancock v. Centurion Health et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDavid et al v. Anderson County, TN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00236
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Hunter et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00413
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Out in the Woods, LLC v. Kaufhold et al (JRG3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00208
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mueller Brass Co. v. Crompton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv02496
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Fox et al v. Cocke County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff: Troy J Fox and Jeanene Fox
Defendant: Cocke County, Tennessee, Maxwell Grayson Laughter, Town of Parrottsville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Haga v. Lawn Care and More Inc. et al (JRG3)
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff: Matthew Gage Haga
Defendant: Lawn Care and More Inc. and John C. Bushong
White v. City of Memphis, TN et al
as 2:2024cv02340
Plaintiff: Mark White, Sr. doing business as Tokyo Nights
Defendant: City of Memphis, TN and Paul Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. City of Brownsville et al
as 1:2024cv01108
Plaintiff: Andrew Terrell Lee
Defendant: City of Brownsville, Haywood County, Billy H. Garrett, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris et al v. Federated Security Solutions, LLC., d/b/a Signal 88 Security et al
as 2:2024cv02339
Plaintiff: MarTerrio Harris and Lacasta Brooks
Defendant: Federated Security Solutions, LLC., d/b/a Signal 88 Security, Huston S. Akins and Ben Teaford

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?