Indiana Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 23,023
Henning v. COOK, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00994
Plaintiff:
Daniel Henning
Defendant:
COOK, INC., COOK MEDICAL, LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McDaniel v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 1:2024cv00981
Plaintiff:
Lucas McDaniel
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
EGGERT v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
JAMES EGGERT
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
VELICKA v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
LINDA VELICKA
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BECK v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
MARK BECK
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ANDERS v. SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ANDERS
Defendant:
SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC., UNITED AIRLINES, INC. and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Walsh et al v. Auger et al
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Allison Walsh and Matthew Walsh
Defendant:
John Alton Auger and JA Auger LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
COPENY v. INDIANAPOLIS POLICE et al
as 1:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
GARY COPENY
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS POLICE, FLINT POLICE and JACKSONVILLE POLICE
FULLER v. MICHAELS STORES, INC.
as 1:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
JUDITH FULLER
Defendant:
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
COPENY v. ENGLAND et al
as 1:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
GARY COPENY
Defendant:
DIANA ENGLAND, MATT EVANS and DIANA WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
