Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 30,649
Franze v. Capper et al
as 1:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Brandon J Franze
Defendant:
Brandon Capper, Jimmy Heflin and Nick Barry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Mitchell
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Tiger A Rogers
Defendant:
Mekel Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ECKELBARGER v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01002
Petitioner:
TREVOR L. ECKELBARGER
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENRY v. VERMILLION COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
as 2:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN HENRY
Defendant:
VERMILLION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HULSEY v. GARDENER et al
as 1:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
CLINTON HULSEY
Defendant:
DELANA GARDENER, CENTURION MEDICAL, BECKY ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAYLOR v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
JAMES SAYLOR
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, JOHN DOE, MADISON GILBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00299
Petitioner:
DANIEL SMITH
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LONAS v. BURKHART
as 1:2024cv00996
Plaintiff:
KIRK LONAS
Defendant:
BRAD BURKHART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
LANE v. SMITH
as 2:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LANE
Defendant:
SMITH SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROWLISON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
LLOYD ROWLISON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
