District Court Cases in Maryland
Cases 21 - 30 of 77,207
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Barmer v. Pentow
as 1:2024cv01693
Plaintiff:
David A. Barmer
Defendant:
Alexander Pentow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company v. Hanover Armory, LLC
as 1:2024cv01664
Plaintiff:
The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company
Defendant:
Hanover Armory, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Rothenhoefer Bros., Inc. v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv01659
Plaintiff:
Rothenhoefer Bros., Inc. doing business as Three Brothers
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MAYHEW v. Vivint Solar Developer, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01668
Plaintiff:
MAREN MAYHEW
Defendant:
Vivint Solar Developer, LLC and SUNRUN INC.
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 13 a Contract market rules violations; recovery of penalty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Civil Rights (Disability Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
