District Court Cases in Mississippi
Cases 1 - 10 of 62,804
Barnum et al v. Target Corporation
as 3:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Alison Barnum and John H. Barnum
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Kincaide
as 3:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Chasity Kincaide
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. Rucker
as 3:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ireka Rucker
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Grimes v. USA
as 1:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Jimmy Ray Grimes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
United States of America v. Davis
as 3:2024cv00148
Defendant:
Adrain Davis and Adrien Davis
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Bequette v. Roux Brothers, LLC.
as 5:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Mary C. Bequette
Defendant:
Roux Brothers, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Miller et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Hubert Miller and Beth Miller
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bounds v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Christy Bounds
Defendant:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stevens v. Baysore
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Tristan Chandler Stevens
Defendant:
Warden Baysore
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
