District Court Cases in North Carolina
Cases 41 - 50 of 87,537
Aalaam v. Movement Mortgage, LLC
as 5:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Anwar A. Aalaam
Defendant:
Movement Mortgage, LLC
Rakestraw v. USA
as 3:2024cv00487
Petitioner:
Maurice Brandon Rakestraw
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rozelle v. USA
as 3:2024cv00488
Petitioner:
Michael Todd Rozelle
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Little v. USA
as 5:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
T'Antae Deon Little
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Herrmann v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Laura Herrmann
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BANKS
Defendant:
RYAN ROSS, ELIZABETH WATERS, MICHAEL HUGGINS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DEAN v. BLUEGRASS HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
HALEY DEAN
Defendant:
BLUEGRASS HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC and BLUEGRASS HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mann+Hummel Filtration Technology US LLC et al v. Jasper Rubber Products, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Mann+Hummel Filtration Technology US LLC and Mann+Hummel Purolator Filters LLC
Defendant:
Jasper Rubber Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Murdock Ready Mixed Concrete v. Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Murdock Ready Mixed Concrete
Defendant:
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc., RB Global Inc., Ritchie Brothers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
